To Walk Invisible: Movies about Writing

PBS TIME!!!

To Walk Invisible is another biopic about the four Bronte siblings (a likely more accurate portrayal than the previous movie I watched). This one presents the four in a both codependent yet tumultuous relationship which all seems to go on completely under their well-meaning father’s nose (played by Jonathan Pryce). Quotes from letters to and from the sisters add to the realism of the movie.

Flashbacks reveal how the four were once so close and imaginative, yet the signs of their adult personalities are still there. The main plot starts with Branwell (Adam Nagaitis) and Anne (Charlie Murphy - no, not the Charlie Murphy who once played basketball against Prince) coming back home from positions after Branwell had an alleged affair with the wife of their employer. At the same time, a depressed Charlotte (Finn Atkins) and a fed-up Emily (Chloe Pirrie) are also back home after attending a school with practical questions of what will become of them when their father dies. Branwell is as he always is, a drunk who cannot commit to a path in life and is constantly bailed out by their father. Meanwhile, his three sisters both pity him and fear what their lives will be like when he will be in control of the family finances.

This brings the writing and publishing into play. That’s right! This film is actually about the women as writers -not made-up love triangles or scenes of pining out windows. Charlotte, having been inspired by a drunken rant by Banwell, decides that the three women should publish poetry under male names in an attempt to earn some income.

At first, Emily is appalled by this idea as her poems are private and she flies into a rage when Charlotte reads them without her consent. Anne is the peacemaker between her sisters and is happy just be writing. Still, Anne hate the idea of being credited as men and wishes they could just write anonymously. Charlotte and Emily insist that if anyone suspects that they are women, their writing will never be judged fa

The movie isn’t without it’s drama. The awkward love between Charlotte and her father’s curate, Arthur Bell Nicholls is somehow even sadder without the grand love triangle knowing their lives together would be so short. Branwell’s depression, love life, and abuse towards his family aren’t shown as everyone constantly catering to him. Instead, Emily chases him from the house with anger while Charlotte continues to plan ways for them to secure their own income. Emily is shy and secretive, yet the closest to Branwell. She is the one who does not wish to ever reveal herself, is the most critical of their brother, and the one who cleans up many messes. Anne is still left as the constant “third sister”, the one just on the outskirts who keeps everyone else taken care of. She’s even the one who suffers the most publishing wise. She is also the one who feels the most guilt and emotion over Branwell as he reaches new lows. *By the way, I finally read The Tenant of Wildfell Hall and it’s fantastic. I actually like it better than Jane Eyre or Wuthering Heights.

The publishing process of the mid-1800s shows how for a first book, the women had to pay to have it published, but still received the proof in the mail (just like now). I imagine contracts, terms of profits, and marketing were quite different, but some of the initial steps really haven’t changed. It also shows the hurt of publication rejection with that added realization that if the three sisters can’t be published they might not be able to survive after their father dies. They also cover topics of publishing fraud, unreliable editors, and subtle fame.

The movie imagines the issues that come with writing under pen names and trying to keep it secret in a small town when Charlotte’s The Professor is rejected but the agents agrees to print Agnes Grey and Wuthering Heights. It also includes the idea of the Charlotte finally telling their father about Jane Eyre’s success in hopes that it will alleviate their father’s worries. He is proud of them and I have no idea if that would be how such a scene played out. This scene is also revealed that their pseudonyms are an attempt to protect Branwell’s feelings who never managed to write his own novel, even as Branwell falls into further debt and ill health. There's a difference to be shown here between professionals and family ties.

Overall, this is a much better version of the tale of the three writers although it end abruptly with post-scripts of their lives and little insight into their short lived lives after Branwell’s death.

Owned by BBC. Emily (Chloe Pirrie), Anne (Charlie Murphy), and Charlotte (Finn Atkins)

Devotion: Movies About Writing

First of all, understand that 1946 was NOT concerned with historical accuracy. This melodrama spent more time on building “woe is me” moments than it did researching the Bronte family. My boyfriend gave it the alternate title “Devotion or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Tuberculosis”.

Second, I’m not really sure what induced me to watch this movie for the first time in years. I didn’t like it as a kid and I didn’t find much to recommend it now.

The story focuses on the idea of the 4 Bronte siblings in an artistic rivalry and, more heavily, on a made-up love triangle between Emily, Charlotte, and (spoiler alert) the man who in reality became Charlotte’s husband. One historically inaccurate piece is the Bronte Sisters being told by their aunt that with all of their worry about novels and poetry, they’ll never get husbands. At the time this story takes place, they would have been in their mid to late 20s Pssh! That’s old maid status in that time!

Devotion stars some of the greats at the time trying to earn some Oscars - Ida Lupino, Olivia de Havilland, and Sydney Greenstreet. I’d mention Paul Henreid, but he gets so over-the-top sometimes that this was NOT his best work. Just saying.

That’s not to say the film doesn’t show some merits of the Bronte’s as artists. The movie opens with a title card staying how 2 of 4 Bronte kids were geniuses - which I find as a big ole F*$@ YOU to Anne Bronte. Okay, I confess I’ve only read a little of her poetry, but I have been to her grave in Scarborough. I feel like they wouldn’t have given her a nice tombstone and an icon on the tourism map if she’d been a lousy writer. I also know that The Tenant of Wildfell Hall is considered one of the first great feminist novels - which I know because my friend had to write a paper on it during university and she told me all about it during lunch over several days.

The movie also addresses some of the struggles for writers at that time, starting with the lack and expense of paper. Emily and Charlotte fight over wrapping paper at the start of the film because they both want to use it for writing something long that would use it all up. They also discuss the patronage needed in an artistic field if you want to eat on a regular basis or the need for thankless jobs like being a governess. However, the need for male pen names because of society’s problems with women writers at the time is glossed over.

Devotion wastes no time in reminding its audience that the only brother, Branwell Bronte was an alcoholic painter, depicting him as a bully to Anne, in need of Charlotte’s guardianship, and constantly under Emily’s criticism yet dependent on her. Luckily the movie leaves out some patriarchal theories that was actually the author of all of his sisters’ works (I’m looking at you fictional character played by Stephen Fry in Cold Comfort Farm!).

Cold Comfort Farm: Here’s Fry’s character Mybug asking Kate Beckinsale’s character Flora Post if she believes “women have souls”. Image property of BBC Films - don’t sue me. I’m an avid Doctor Who and PBS Masterpiece fan. You need me as much as I need you, BBC!

Devotion does cover where inspiration comes from for a writer, but it does this poorly and obvioulsy. Anne and Charlotte are both so disgusted by their employers as in their governess work, it is supposed to be the backdrop of Jane Eyre and Agnes Grey (which I own and might finally read after all of this). And a derelict house left abandoned on the moors gave Emily the idea for Wuthering Heights. All three of these ideas are credited by historians, by the way, but the movie makes it very obvious without any detail. I don’t feel like inspiration is always obvious, but sometimes worms it’s way in and we realize later where the idea came from.

Some things I do like in the film from a writing point-of-view includes the praise and fears of the siblings, but again this is handled in an over-the-top way. All 4 have a certain amount of jealously towards each other’s talents, which can happen even at the same time as loving someone else’s work and desperately wanting to succeed. But that want for mutual success is lost in the movie to the constant head turns and near swoons of despair.

The same goes for the need for critical analysis and praise of their work. Emily especially is shown as more secretive and protective of her writing. Anne is willing to just keep trying with a sort of blind optimism. Charlotte is the one who seeks the help of professionals that could get her published and defends her own work with logic. She’s the one overjoyed when famed novelist William Makepeace Thackeray gives them praise.

I don’t know if these are the actual personalities of the women, but this does cover three of the major personalities of many writers I know. I’m a little disappointed that my personality matches more of Emily Bronte’s reactions in the film. Wuthering Heights is not my favorite Bronte book. Jane Eyre is. Duh. But the thing is - the movie claims that this supposed love triangle was where the emotion within Wuthering Heights came from, proving that the screenwriters never read it. The point of Wuthering Heights is how toxic people can be and call it love not how 2 sisters should fall for the same boring dude.

Still, the part of this movie that bugs the crap out of me is the idea that the Bronte sisters could have never written of love and loss the way the did without experience that include a ridiculous unrequited love, a single man to be the object of 2 sisters’ affections, and the poorly filmed dream sequences of betrayal. In the end, Devotion reduces their lives to stereotypes and tragedy.

Poor Bronte’s.

Devotion: Arthur Kennedy as Branwell, Ida Lupino as Emily, Olivia de Havilland as Charlotte, and Nancy Coleman as Anne as the Bronte siblings playing on the Yorkshire Moors. Image property of Warner Bros. Don’t sue me please! All you’ll get is a collection of Funko pops and empty notebooks too pretty to write in.